site stats

Griffiths v northern territory

WebGRIffIThS V NORThERN TERRITORY Of AUSTRALIA Federal Court of Australia (Weinberg J) 17 July 2006 ... Fejo v Northern Territory (1998) 195 CLR 96 applied. 5. … WebMar 15, 2024 · This article was written by Scott Singleton, Nick Testro and Johnathon Hall.. On 13 March 2024, the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in the …

Mabo, Wik, and now ‘Griffiths’: the endorsement by the High …

WebAug 26, 2016 · The compensation is payable in relation to land in and around Timber Creek, Northern Territory. The lots vary in size and include 1000sqm and 2 hectare lots. This is an evolving area of law and ... Webof compensation in Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (Timber Creek).9 Mansfield J ordered payment of $3.3 million to the native title holders (the Ngaliwurru and Nungali peoples). Of this some $512,000 was awarded for economic loss, $1.488 million was paid for interest that would otherwise have accrued and $1.3 million was paid for non- facts about the river wandle https://thephonesclub.com

The Timber Creek compensation case — ANTAR

WebMay 20, 2024 · In Northern Territory v Griffiths (2024) 93 ALJR 327 the High Court had to decide the economic value of extinguished native title rights and the compensation payable for the loss of cultural value. It is … WebNov 4, 2016 · The decision in Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3) [2016] FCA 900 has created a slight headache for the Northern Territory and Commonwealth Government for their future ... WebAug 24, 2016 · Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3) - [2016] FCA 900: Home. Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3) [2016] FCA 900; 337 ALR 362; 152 ALD 72. Date: 24 August 2016: Bench: Mansfield J: Catchwords: facts about the river ure

Henny Penny and native title compensation - is the sky really …

Category:Northern Territory v Griffiths (2024) 93 ALJR 327 - School of La…

Tags:Griffiths v northern territory

Griffiths v northern territory

Northern Territory v Griffiths (Deceased) and Jones on behalf of …

WebOn 24 August 2016, Justice Mansfield handed down his decision in the first case involving judicial consideration of the calculation of native title compensation: see Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3) [2016] FCA 900. WebIn Griffith v. Griffith, 240 N.C. 271, 278, 81 S.E.2d 918, 923, (1954), our Supreme Court said that "the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration to which all other …

Griffiths v northern territory

Did you know?

WebAug 24, 2016 · Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3); [2016] FCA 900 - Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3) (24 August 2016); [2016] FCA 900 (24 … WebNov 4, 2024 · In what is said to be one of the most significant cases since the Wik and Mabo High Court decisions, the Griffiths v Northern Territory case became the first to seek compensation for the extinguishment of native title rights and interests under the Native Title Act (1993).The case challenged the limitations of the western compensatory process by …

Web13 Northern Territory v Griffiths (2024) 256 FCR 478 at 484 [7]. 14 Griffiths (2016) 337 ALR 362 at 370 [33]. 15 Griffiths (2016) 337 ALR 362 at 369 [29], [32]. 16 Northern Territory v Griffiths (2024) 256 FCR 478 at 485 -488 [10] [11]. 17 The claimant group found to have held native title is now the compensation Claim WebNORTHERN TERRITORY V GRIFFITHS (2024) 364 ALR 208 D ecision-making in native title decisions has been described as a ‘question of how much chaos a judge is willing to …

WebJul 10, 2024 · The 2016 judgment in the ‘Timber Creek’ compensation case (Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (no. 3) (2016) FCA 900) signals an end to an era of extinguishment-related injustice and inequality, representing, as it does, the first litigated Federal Court award of compensation for the loss or impairment of rights and interests ... WebOct 1, 2016 · Timber Creek is a small town in the Northern Territory, located on the Victoria Highway 285km west of Katherine. The Ngaliwurru and Nungali Peoples hold …

WebJun 6, 2024 · Attachment/s. Mr Hughston SC will discuss the approach taken by the Court in Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3) [2016] FCA 900 (Timber Creek) to the assessment of compensation and in particular the division of the award of compensation into components of economic and non-economic loss.

WebThe High Court of Australia’s decision in Northern Territory v Griffiths (2024) 269 CLR 1 (‘the Timber Creek compensation case’) provided long-awaited judicial guidance on the … facts about the river wear for kidsWebThis matter follows the Court’s judgment of 19 March 2014 in Griffiths v Northern Territory [2014] FCA 256 (Griffiths) which considered issues of liability and determined that matters as to compensation would be reserved for further consideration. The respondent in this matter was the Northern Territory of Australia. dog beaches in miamihttp://www.nntt.gov.au/News-and-Publications/hotspots/Documents/Hot%20Spots%2027/Griffiths%20v%20Northern%20Territory.pdf facts about the river trentWebNorthern Territory v Mr A. Griffiths (deceased) and Lorraine Jones on behalf of the Ngaliwurru and Nungali Peoples [2024] HCA 7 is an Australian native title court case that … facts about the river tyne for kidsWeb2 On 15 September 2016 the Northern Territory lodged an appeal of Griffiths SJ. They are seeking clarity in relation to aspects of the decision, including the valuation of non-economic loss. ... Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (2006) 165 FCR 300) was tendered by the Applicants. Palmer and Asche facts about the river weardog beaches in north carolinaWebGriffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (No 3) [2016] FCA 900 File number: NTD 18 of 2011 Judge: MANSFIELD J Date of judgment: 24 August 2016 Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – claim for compensation for loss or impairment of traditional rights and interests – “just terms” compensation under s 51 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) facts about the river weaver